In their research, Hernon and Rossiter learned that the efficiency of work team effectiveness is cause by many factors. These include the unity within a team, the team structure itself, the team’s performance, leadership abilities exemplified by people who are in authority, means of motivation and the ultimate team objectives. They added that the said variables have been established and that they can definitely assist in evaluating the effectiveness of work teams (Hernon & Rossiter 130).
To be more specific, there are at least three types of characteristics which depict team effectiveness based from conventionally researched and classified forms of work group efficiency. First is the organizational framework which refers to function, background, work, task, leadership, colleague and asset. Next is the input coming from each member of an organization where individual proficiency, faith, dedication and flexibility form part. Last is the team procedure involving harmonization, interaction, unity, decision-making, disagreement, social association and reaction to the performance of the team (Hernon & Rossiter 131).
Aside from the said kinds of characteristics, there are eight qualities which constantly give the rationale behind why work teams are effective. These attributes are composed of an evident and inspiring objective, an outcome-motivated framework, proficient members of the work teams, integrated dedication, a mutual organizational setting, benchmarks of excellence, assistance and appreciation from outside forces and lastly, an ethical team leadership. A combination of all the mentioned qualities definitely ensures the success of an organization and the professional growth of the people (Hernon & Rossiter 131).
Benefits of Effective Work Team Effectiveness Hernon and Rossiter highlighted the Hackman’s framework of team effectiveness in order to concretely present the benefits to be derived from making a team as one of the essential factors of organizational success. In particular, the two stated that while teams may not be totally suitable in an organizational or project setting, in some aspects, however, are proven with their provision of specific benefits.
These advantages refer to an augmented operating flexibility, the presence of a collective set of talented and experienced people, more varied human resources, improved flow of information and communication and most importantly, better level of performance outcome from each personnel and the organization in general (Hernon & Rossiter 130). Additionally, it was established that when organizational work teams perform and decide willingly, their outputs are of superior quality than that of the most intellectual yet single performance.
An effective work teams also pave the way in higher degrees of personnel satisfaction and lesser operating funds. It was likewise presented that team works result into improved effectiveness due to trimmed down time cycle as well as a smaller number of rejects in production due to assured quality (Hernon & Rossiter 130). Citing Nadler, Spencer and company, Hernon and Rossited further identified the benefits resulting from efficient work team effectiveness.
The additional advantages are seen in the creation of more thoughts and initiatives, an increased product titles, better dedication and encouragement, an extensive scope of visions and viewpoints, distribution of risks, if any, reassignment of proficiency and lastly, support from the community. The two authors stressed that such advantages definitely work as motivating factors in order for achieving the efficiency of work team effectiveness (Hernon & Rossiter 130).