The literature on rural loc?l governments suggests that rural governments like Colorado should have fewer resources available to them when managing the new responsibilities associated with devolution. Rural c?unty governments are more likely to be made up of part time or volunteer staff and tend to have fewer professional staff members such as grant writers and planners (Rasker, 65). Rural c?unty leaders of Colorado are more likely to indicate that they have access to such professionals from outside sources, including are? development districts, state departments of economic development, or community groups (White, 832).
Two factors are at work in shaping location related outlines in the Colorado region. The loveliness of the c?untryside and other facilities are attracting populace and earnings. But, admission to loc?l urban centers continues to be an significant constituent in place associated decisions. The net result is that c?unties outside the commuting range of these metropolitan centers but with close access and good interstate connections have greater population densities and more growth in densities than less accessible c?unties. The idea of `footlooseness’ in location related decisions is ? relative concept.
The degree of `footlooseness’ may be increasing as ? result of technological innovations such as the Internet, overnight delivery, and satellite television, that bring many of the business tools and amenities of urban life to rural settings. But most individuals in the mountain c?unties of the West still appear to desire access to major urban centers as demonstrated by their actual location related patterns. While footloose retirement incom? is clearly fostering growth in Rural Colorado, indirect evidence in this study suggests that some wage and salary incom? earners are attracted to mountain c?unties independently of other forms of incom?.
The regional metropolitan center distance gradient is steeper for wage and salary incom?, for example, than for other types of incom? suggesting that the location of employment-based incom? is at least partly independent of retirement incom?. Employment-based incom? is footloose in the sense that mountain c?unties are feasible locations, but it is somewhat less footloose than other forms of incom? by virtue of its stronger orientation to metropolitan centers.
Moreover, the flattening of the per capita incom? gradient suggests that the high-incom? households became relatively more footloose between 1985 and 1994. Since capital incom? recipients, who tend to have comparatively higher incom?s, are free to choose their location of residence independent of employment constraints, they are less likely to benefit from technological changes that enhance mobility. This suggests that the more affluent wage and salary earners are more likely to be the ones causing the flattening of the per capita incom? gradient.