We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Modeling as ID facet ( but besides cad work involved )

Sustainability- i.e. stuffs, mdf, how the cut outs of ply were used on the opposite side- minimum waste of ply or mdf.


Section 1 – Wicked jobs and ain illustration

A wicked, ( or ill-defined ) job in design refers to a design undertaking non being able to be completed to the best criterion due to restraints such as user, environment or stuffs available. These might besides wholly be invariably altering, and work outing one job may convey rise to another in a different environment, or with a different user. This means that the job is ne’er solved definitively

Design task wicked problems TOPICS SPECIFICALLY FOR YOU

With the design undertaking that I tackled, a java tabular array, it can be called a wicked job due to the fact that no tabular array is the “ right ” or incorrect manner to plan one. It has some bounds that make it functional such as being a level surface which points can be placed on, and non tipping over when done so. Coffee tabular arraies have countries which can be changed and have so much variableness that this brings rise to the inquiry of which design is best? It should be the 1 that can be used in the most environments, by the most people, and work the best. But in different environments this last point can hold differing qualities.

For illustration in a little place a little java tabular array would be wanted, supplying adequate infinite to set magazines/books/drinks down on and non taking up any more infinite in the room. This design in a big room would be about useless and the tabular array would lodge out aesthetically as it would non suit in with the size of everything else in the room, and would non be what the user wanted.

Another job is that the user would desire to utilize the tabular array for different things depending on their ain personal demands, and the environment that it is in. So should the tabular array be designed to hold tonss of storage infinite, Or to be every bit simple as possible?

If a java tabular array was designed in a more traditional manner with thick wooden legs, a solid base, and a wooden top surface, it would non suit in with the manner of many houses, as a really simplistic glass topped table with thin legs would non accommodate the environment of many houses besides.

Should the tabular array be designed to hold wheels and be easy to travel about, so holding many utilizations? Or should it be a heavy fixed characteristic of a room?

With many differing sentiments on what design would be best for each user, environment, and undertaking ; what could be considered the best design, and how do you make up one’s mind which is best? A design is good if it is able to make the undertaking it is designed for, is wanted by the user, and is sustainable ( either by long life or recycling ) . The last is the most easy solved if a java tabular array was to be designed for all users, undertakings and environments ; and should be dependent on the stuffs used and the manner that they are joined together. The other two jobs are much more hard to work out, as users will desire the tabular array for different things, and no tabular array can be designed to make everything and be the simplest tabular array at the same clip. This job is joined with the first of the tabular array being able to make the undertaking it is designed for, as the undertaking it is designed for depends on what the user wants it for, and it will non be wanted by the user if it does non make full the demand that they want.

When I started the design of my java tabular array I did non cognize everything that I needed to cognize to plan it. I had to happen anthropometric informations so that the tabular array could be designed to suit most people. The information that I used was for the lower percentile females and higher percentile males so it could be used by most. However this information is based merely on British informations aggregation so the tabular array may non hold been comfy for usage in another country of the universe. Another fluctuation is the tallness of the chair that a individual is sitting in as this is non known. I learnt all these jobs as I began planing it and shortly realised that no ‘perfect ‘ java tabular array could be designed. I learnt about most of the jobs at the beginning of the undertaking, and had to plan around them, and in that sense it was non a ‘linear ‘ theoretical account of design.

I stopped my last design undertaking because I believed I had come up with the best solution to the design undertaking in the clip restraints that were applied. I assume that similar instances will use to my future design undertakings whilst in instruction. Professional interior decorators must hold clip restraints every bit good, if employed by a company ; otherwise they would merely halt planing when they believed that they had arrived at the best solution.

When a individual expresses their positions about design it is normally to foreground countries of betterment or countries where the merchandise has achieved its undertaking exceptionally good. A design is non ‘right ‘ or ‘wrong ‘ every bit long as it performs the undertaking it was designed to make. The standards that make it ‘better ‘ or ‘worse ‘ include ; comfort of usage, sustainability, merchandise life, aesthetics etc.

There is no manner to ‘test ‘ a so called solution to a wicked job to see if it is the best manner to make it, as for illustration, you could non test a java tabular array with every individual user in the universe. Every effort at a solution to a wicked job counts as they are irreversible and future interior decorators will look back at what has already been created to happen ways to better upon it. And in this manner ne’er get downing from a ‘clean slate. ‘ There is no manner to state when you should halt planing a wicked job because you do non cognize when you will come up with a better thought. However if something is produced which is better than anything else on the market in one manner, and equal or better in others so that is a sensible clip to halt designing.

Section 2 – In relation to have undertaking ; traditional ID facets, applied scientist facets, sustainability facets

In the java tabular array that I late designed, there are different countries of the planing procedure that could be considered traditional industrial interior decorator facets, or that of the applied scientist and other countries where sustainability is designed in.

For illustration I designed as an industrial interior decorator when sing the biotechnologies of the tabular array, and the mark users. This had an impact on my concluding design signifier and map as it changed the dimensions of the tabular array, and the pick of stuffs used. But associating in with these I besides had to see the sustainability. For example- there would be no point picking a stuff which would be best for the aesthetics or map, if something merely every bit good and more reclaimable could be used. I besides decided to merely utilize three types of stuff in my design, so that it could be easy recycled. I used glass, plyboard, and mdf, which is already a recycled stuff. I besides designed the patterning on the legs to be negatives of each other on each side. This meant that the cut outs for one side were used on the other- minimising waste to the bantam border pieces that the form was cut from. ( Approximately 1mm broad and 400mm long on each border )

I shaped the legs to be triangular in form for stableness, and sustainability, as the legs could so be cut from one rectangular piece with no waste apart from sanding shaves. The glass top was cut from one rectangular piece with minimum waste due to the form. The glass can besides be recycled or reused.

The Engineering facets were linked in with the stuff picks and dimensions that were picked because I had to happen a manner to fall in the triangular pieces together in a manner that would equilibrate the glass top and still supply an attractive presentation of the ‘legs ‘ . As the tallness of the triangular subdivisions was fixed due to ergonomic restraints, the length and angle of the underside border had to be decided on. This was chosen by planing for sustainability and seeking to cut down waste, and doing the tabular array most stable by supplying a long underside border to supply support. The glass top had to be supported in all four corners and I placed my trigons in such a manner that the top corners would supply support. I besides made my design variable- the user could pick how many ‘pairs ‘ of legs to utilize, how to set up the braces, and the length of the tabular array. This meant that the tabular array tops would hold to be made to order- but set sizes could be produced. The tabular array now had a wider market as the surface size was variable, extinguishing the variable of environment size. The tabular array did nevertheless hold a minimal size restraint of two braces of legs- for the support needed to equilibrate the surface.

I joined the braces of triangular legs together by cutting a slot into one subdivision near to the 90 grade corner and a triangular cut out the same thickness as the mdf on the other subdivision the same distance from the terminal, so that when slotted together they made an equal lengthed ‘L ‘ form on the outer corner. This put the support points in the outer corners, supplying more stableness in the merchandise.

Section 3 – Reflect on ain public presentation of above 3 things and countries for betterment

The industrial interior decorator facets of my undertaking were the footing, ( ergonomically ) , and the coating of my design. They gave size restraints at the start and aesthetic thoughts at the terminal of the designing procedure when I had considered balance, sustainability and undertaking a broad market. These thoughts of forms and coatings meant that I could unite all three facets to do a good merchandise.

A batch of the sustainability jobs that occurred when bring forthing this merchandise could be eliminated if it were to be mass produced. The patterning could be laser cut with no waste, as could the triangular subdivisions. The waste created from the rounding of the glass corners could be recycled directly off and reused. They would be fast to bring forth by machine, cut downing power use, and each stuff is easy recycled even by the user.

I could hold improved the manner that the patterning was attached to the mdf subdivisions as it was glued on in my undertaking, it would be better designed for sustainability and disassembly if the forms could hold been set in to the mdf pieces, and likely would hold made the merchandise more durable- increasing the merchandise life.

I would besides hold designed a gum elastic pes for the leg subdivisions so that they were more stable and would non steal, and besides to protect the corners of the triangular pieces as they were easy misshapen by a knock against something as they tapered down to a point. Another option would be to bevel the terminal more ; cut downing the sum of gum elastic used for the pess, as they could merely be placed on the bottom and non impact the aesthetics of the outer seeable surface.

As an technology facet this bevel could besides be applied to the top corner that the glass sits on, doing the support points more stable and less prone to damage or have on from the weight put on the tabular array or merely of the glass itself. This would increase merchandise life every bit good.

The most expensive portion of the fabrication procedure is the glass top, this could be replaced with a faster cheaper method, by utilizing a clear acrylic, nevertheless, I think that this detracts from the merchandises visual aspect by a important sum to deter the user market from purchasing it. Acrylic is besides more detrimental to the environment to bring forth and harder to recycle and recycle.

If possible when redesigning I would wish to hold made the merchandise accessible to everybody ergonomically- adding in an adjustable tallness characteristic would make this but would do production procedures much more expensive and the merchandise itself more expensive. The other option would be to hold different set dimensions for the tallness depending on where in the universe the merchandise is sold, but that does non account for people who live in a different portion of the universe to where they originate from. I hope to hold designed a high quality, low cost to fabricate, and desirable merchandise, for everybody. Therefore doing a ‘better ‘ solution to the wicked job at manus.

Share this Post!

Send a Comment

Your email address will not be published.